NocoDB vs Teable (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, licensing, and self-hosting.
Bottom line: NocoDB is the mature, battle-tested choice for layering a no-code UI on top of existing SQL databases; Teable is the architecture-forward pick for teams starting fresh who want native Postgres storage and real-time collaboration from day one.
NocoDB has a multi-year head start and a community of nearly 50,000 GitHub stars. Its core differentiator is compatibility: it connects to MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, SQL Server, and MariaDB without requiring any schema change, making it uniquely practical when you need a no-code interface over a live database you can't restructure. The integration depth and documentation reflect that maturity.
Teable stores data natively in Postgres as real table rows — no abstraction layer — which means direct SQL queries against your Teable data just work. Real-time multi-user editing is built into the architecture from the start, not retrofitted. The codebase is newer and, as a result, cleaner in places.
The gap is ecosystem. Around 14,000 GitHub stars versus NocoDB's ~50,000 tells the story: Teable is genuinely compelling but earlier-stage. Teams comfortable with newer open-source projects will find Teable's Postgres-native design more forward-thinking; teams that need broad database-connector support and a large, settled community today should lean toward NocoDB.
NocoDB
Turn any MySQL, Postgres, SQLite or SQL Server database into a smart spreadsheet UI.
Pros
- Works with databases you already own — no data migration required
- Both REST and GraphQL APIs generated automatically for every table
- Self-hostable on any VPS via Docker with no vendor lock-in
Cons
- AGPL-3.0 license complicates embedding in proprietary SaaS without a commercial license
- UI is less visually polished than Airtable or Baserow
Teable
Open-source no-code database built natively on Postgres — real-time, API-first, and Airtable-compatible.
Pros
- Pure Postgres-native storage means you can query Teable data directly via SQL
- Real-time collaboration built in from the ground up, not added on
- AGPL-licensed and self-hostable via Docker with an active development pace
Cons
- Younger project with a smaller community and integration ecosystem than NocoDB or Baserow
- Template library and plugin depth are still growing
NocoDB vs Teable: spec comparison
| Spec | NocoDB | Teable |
|---|---|---|
| License | AGPL-3.0 / Open-core | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Starting price | Free / self-host | Free / self-host |
| Pricing model | open-core | open-core |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Platforms | web, self-hosted, docker, cloud | web, self-hosted, docker, cloud |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| GitHub stars | 49,800 | 14,200 |
FAQ
NocoDB vs Teable: which is better?
Neither is universally better. NocoDB (Free / self-host) suits Teams with existing SQL databases who want a no-code UI layer without migrating or restructuring their data.; Teable (Free / self-host) suits Teams that want a Postgres-native no-code database with real-time collaboration and full SQL-level data access.. The spec table above breaks down the differences.
Is NocoDB or Teable cheaper?
Both start at the same price (Free / self-host).